Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2006No. B180004PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Joe Amall Walker previously raped and assaulted two women, one of whom was a prostitute (Irma P.) and one of whom was not (Dorothy B.), and assaulted a second prostitute after she had agreed to have sex with him (Stephanie L.). During Walker’s trial for the asphyxiation murder of Kathryn M. Waters, also a prostitute, the People were allowed to introduce evidence of Walker’s three prior sexual assaults on these women to establish identity, motive and intent pursuant to Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b), 1 as well as to prove Walker’s predisposition to commit the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. SpectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. CottoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API