People v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Joe Amall Walker previously raped and assaulted two women, one of whom was a prostitute (Irma P.) and one of whom was not (Dorothy B.), and assaulted a second prostitute after she had agreed to have sex with him (Stephanie L.). During Walker’s trial for the asphyxiation murder of Kathryn M. Waters, also a prostitute, the People were allowed to introduce evidence of Walker’s three prior sexual assaults on these women to establish identity, motive and intent pursuant to Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b), 1 as well as to prove Walker’s predisposition to commit the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. SpectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. CottoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.