Chandler v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors.
The questions presented in the motion to quash the indictment are the same heretofore ruled upon in the case of Ves Banks v. State, recently decided, and Ex parte Gilmore, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 529, 228 S. W. Rep., 199.
We think the contention of appellant that his conviction in another case of the offense of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors would preclude his conviction for the possession of such liquors is not sound. Ordinarily, it is conceived that one unlawfully possessing' a quantity of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923