Richmond v. State

ON REHEARING.

March 5, 1924.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

The only question raised in the motion is the sufficiency of the evidence. The facts relied on by the State briefly were as follows: (1) Appellant’s possession when arrested in fall of 1921 of 27% gallons of whisky in his car; (2) his ownership of the ear; (3) his statement when overtaken and arrested “Well, you got me, I got twenty-seven gallons;” (4) Duncan’s testimony that he had a conversation with appellant at Stamford “just prior to his leaving to get the whisky ... I told him if he run across some good whisky to bring me a quart; ... he had…