Legal Opinion

Britt v. Upchurch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1990No. 551PA89PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The issues presented in this appeal are whether the Court of Appeals erred (1) in holding that the affidavit of the attorney who drafted the testator’s will was admissible at trial to show the testator’s intent; and (2) in reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for plaintiff. We conclude that the trial court was correct in refusing to consider the affidavit and in granting summary judgment for plaintiff. We therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Walter Hartman, the father of plaintiff, executed his will on 12 March 1979. At that time Mr. Hartman…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Thomas v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Fulwood v. . FulwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Holmes v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hammer v. HammerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Creekmore v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Cameron v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. RL Regi North Carolina, LLC v. Estate of MoserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API