People v. Tupper
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Defendant was convicted of a felony, and as ground for a new trial he alleged by affidavit, which was not contradicted, that during the argument of the case to the jury the Judge absented himself from the courtroom for the period of twenty minutes. It was also alleged by the affidavit that during such absence the judge was out of sight and hearing of the proceedings going on within the courtroom. The foregoing facts being undisputed, we are fully satisfied they demand a retrial of the defendant. The argument of the case to the jury is as much a part of the trial as the introduction of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BeuermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Turbeville v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- O'Brien v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank Delano Gay, Oliver Townsend and Willie Olen Scott v. Marcell Graham, Warden, Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- People v. GriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.