O'Brien v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Criminal Court of Arapahoe County. Indictment and conviction for seduction under promise of marriage.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
Plaintiff in error -was defendant below. He was charged with an offense expressly designated by the statute as a fel*562ony and made punishable on conviction by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not exceeding ten years. Session Laws 1885, p. 166; Mills’ An. Stats., sec. 1825.
Being put in jeopardy for such an offense it was the right and privilege of defendant to have the trial conducted with all due care and circumspection, and to have the requirements of the law faithfully pursued and firmly upheld in all substantial particulars.’
Among other things, the following proceedings duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Britton v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Haverly Invincible Mining Co. v. HowcuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Cook v. DoudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Peri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Raab v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.