Legal Opinion
People v. Woodward
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1922No. Docket No. 159PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The defendant was convicted of having intoxicating liquor in his possession in violation of section 2 of Act No. 338, Pub. Acts 1917, as amended by Act No. 53, Pub. Acts 1919. He was arrested in his own home. The officers who made the arrest were sent there by the lieutenant in charge of the police station. They were not permitted to disclose the information imparted to them. They arrived there about 2:30 a. m. We quote from the testimony of Officer John Rehm:
*513“Q. Upon arriving there, what did you discover? ■ When you first got there, what did you do?
“A T TiAcn'f’ii'fpil
“Mr. Dodge: What’s that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Commonwealth v. TibbettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Commonwealth v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. KamhoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Rouda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Chin OnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
- People v. ChimovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. LivermoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.