Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1997No. 96-3810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENSON, Judge.

Appellant, Earl Bradford, appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion which alleged the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Because the trial court failed to consider the claims raised in a timely amendment to appellant’s motion, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for a reconsideration of appellant’s motion and amended motion.

This court affirmed appellant’s conviction for robbery with a weapon on November 23, 1994. The mandate was issued on December 9, 1994. Appellant then filed a 3.850 motion seeking postconviction relief on the ground of ineffective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GunsbySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Shaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adalberto Ramos v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Himes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API