Legal Opinion

Adalberto Ramos v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2015No. 4D13-4382 and 4D13-4746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Adalberto Ramos appeals an order denying hisi motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. One of his claims is that the trial cohrt failed to consider his “amended” motion. We agree and reverse and remand for further review of both of appellant’s motions. See Bradford v. State, 701 So.2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that trial court erred in failing to continue the evidentiary hearing on the original 8.850 motion until such time as the claims raised in the amended motion could also be considered),

The amended motion was first filed as a motion for new trial.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure & the Florida Rules of Appellate ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Bradford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ADALBERTO RAMOS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API