St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Marcofich
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Sixth Supreme Judicial District. Action by Frank Marcofick against the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Bailway Company, the International & Great Northern Bailway Company, and another. A judgment for plaintiff against 'the defendants named was affirmed by the Court of.Civil Appeals (185 S. W. 51), and such defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Prank Marcofick, defendant in error, sued the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico and the International & Great Northern Bailway Companies, plaintiffs in error, and the Texas & Pacific Bailway Company, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained to a shipment of mules from Brownsville to Texarkana. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant in error against all the companies except the Texas & Pacific. On appeal by plaintiffs in error the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 185 S. W. 51. In the view we take of the case, a full statement of the facts is not necessary.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cole v. State Ex Rel. CoboliniTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrawickTexas Supreme Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pledger v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Fortinberry v. State ex rel. MyersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Brown v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hodges v. Coke CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.