Legal Opinion

Wolf Recovery Foundation v. United States Forest Service

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 19, 2010No. Civ. 09-0686-E-BLWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it a motion for injunctive relief filed by plaintiffs. The Court held oral argument on February 18, 2010, and the motion is at issue. For the reasons described below, the Court will deny the motion.

LITIGATION BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the Forest Service from using helicopters in the Frank Church Wilderness to dart and collar wolves. Plaintiffs claim that the use of aircraft violates NEPA and the Wilderness Act.

In 1964, Congress passed the Wilderness Act to protect areas “untrammeled by-man,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Wilderness Watch v. Fran P. MainellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. High Sierra Hikers Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilderness Watch v. IwamotoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  2. Wilderness Watch v. VilsackDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2017
  3. High Sierra Hikers Ass'n v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Chidinma Grace Salako v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  5. Wilderness Watch v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API