Legal Opinion

Chiarovano v. Buttnick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1961No. 35464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

— This action was instituted by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside, as an illegal preference, a payment made by the bankrupt to the defendants.

Nathan’s Clothes Shop, Inc., the bankrupt (hereinafter referred to as Nathan’s), was a clothing store in Tacoma. Prior to January 1, 1958, Nathan’s was in arrears in the amount of five hundred twenty-five dollars on account of merchandise bought from the defendants. On December 15, 1958, the defendants filed suit for the amount, and, on December 18th, their attorney accompanied a Pierce county •deputy sheriff with a writ of attachment to Nathan’s for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. McKay v. Sperry Flour Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Kearney (In Re American Properties, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  2. Genova v. Rivera Funeral Home (In Re Castillo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API