Legal Opinion

State v. Gross

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 3, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

Exceptions and motions. Indictments charging incest. Cases were tried together without objection. Ver*162diets of guilty were rendered against Alton A. Gross and Harold I. Gross ; not guilty as to Blanche Gross.

The apparent inconsistency in the findings of the jury is accounted for by the fact that the evidence against the male respondents included confessions made by each of them and that aside from these confessions, the case did not warrant a conviction.

The exceptions relied upon are identical in both cases and are set out as follows:

“Respondent objected to a certain exhibit numbered ‘State 3’…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  2. State v. MorinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  4. Wood v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API