Legal Opinion
Eder v. Department of Fish & Game
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 2009No. A120532PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
In this case we uphold the constitutionality of Fish and Game Code section 8279.1, subdivision (c), which is an important adjunct to the tristate California, Oregon, and Washington agreement to regulate Dungeness crab fishing.
Plaintiffs Robert Eder, Bryan Randall, and Justin Yager are Oregon Dungeness crab fishermen. Defendant California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) revoked their California Dungeness crab vessel permits because they violated section 8279.1, subdivision (c) by fishing for crab in San Francisco waters and then fishing for crab in Oregon sooner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nielsen v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sturgell v. Dept. of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Sturgell v. Dept. of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020