Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dodd v. Newton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 1970No. 45564, 45565Published

1ConcurrenceHall, Presiding Judge

The majority opinion holds that evidence of the "contingent fee” schedule of the local bar is relevant and admissible in a quantum meruit suit. I disagree. "A contingent fee may or may not be reasonable, but it is by definition a proportionate part of a judgment recovered by the attorney for his client.” Old Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Barnard, 120 Ga. App. 596, 597 (171 SE2d 636). It is "payable by special contract out of the proceeds of the suit.” Modlin v. Smith, 13 Ga. App. 259, 264 (79 SE 82). The "happening of the contingency is a condition precedent to the right of the attorney to recovery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  2. Byrd v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Dorsey v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Sellers v. City of SummervilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Old Equity Life Insurance v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API