Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Hume

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1890PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove, J.) Bill to compel the executor of an estate to pay over a portion of a legacy alleged to be due. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The complainant, as survivor or herself and 'William Byrne, brings this suit against defendant, as executor of the last will and testament of Thomas Byrne, deceased, to recover the sum of $2,429.34, part of a legacy of $3,500 left by said will to herself and her husband, William Byrne, now deceased. The sum in dispute was paid by the executor to satisfy a mortgage upon a farm devised by the same will to the said legatees.

The will of Thomas Byrne, under which this controversy arises, was made on January 17, 1882, and contained the following provisions:

“Second. I give and devise to my father…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glover v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dudley v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Calhoun v. CracknellMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Riebow v. EnschMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API