Legal Opinion
Rembrandt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1922No. 3618PublishedCited by 15 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Samuel Rembrandt. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
[1] Section 39 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10203) reads as follows, omitting those portions not now important:
“Whoever shall promise, offer or give * * * any money * * * to any officer of the United States, or to any person acting for or on behalf of the United States in any official function, under or by authority of any department or office of the government thereof * * * with intent to influence his decision or action on any question, matter, cause, or proceeding which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before him in his official…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. HaasU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Browne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Hurley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.