Evel v. City of Utica
Supreme Court of Kansas
■ Appeal from Ness district court; Albert S. Foulks, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
The question upon which the parties herein divide is whether the proceedings taken by the authorities of Utica, a city of the third class, towards the condemnation of land lying outside of the city for waterworks, are valid.
The city proceeded under the provisions of the third-class-city act, which provides that private property may be taken for public use for railroads, market houses and market places or “for any other necessary purpose.” It prescribes the procedure for condemnation, authorizing the appointment of five disinterested…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Coldwater v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Farwell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Enterprise v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- White v. RomneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- McGinley ex rel. McGinley v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961