Legal Opinion

City of Enterprise v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1900No. 11696PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Dickinson district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J.:

The city of Enterprise owns all of its water-works system or plant except the well from which the water-supply is drawn ; that is owned by one Guilford Smith. The city, acting under chapter 82, Laws of 1897 (Gen. Stat. 1899, §§ 653-665; Gen. Stat. 1897, ch. 39,. §§ 9-27), instituted an action to condemn the land of Smith, upon which the well was situated. A demurrer to its petition for insufficiency of facts stated was filed. The demurrer was sustained, and from the order sustaining it error has been prosecuted to this court.

1.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oliver v. NugenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Flott v. Wenger Mixer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Lindburg v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. City of Leavenworth v. Leavenworth City & Fort Leavenworth Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Hornaday v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API