Doe No. 2 v. Montana State University
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION JANE DOE NO. 2, No. CV-20-12-BU-SEH Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER . V. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Claim 2.! Grounds asserted for the motion are: (1) Plaintiff's disparate impact theory in Claim 2 “is not cognizable under Title [X;”* and (2) Claim 2 “is unsupported by any factual content to plausibly suggest [Montana State University’s (“MSU”)] alleged policies or customs—all of which are gender neutral on their face— ' Doe. 3. * Doc.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.