Legal Opinion

Doe No. 2 v. Montana State University

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 24, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00012Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION JANE DOE NO. 2, No. CV-20-12-BU-SEH Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER . V. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Claim 2.! Grounds asserted for the motion are: (1) Plaintiff's disparate impact theory in Claim 2 “is not cognizable under Title [X;”* and (2) Claim 2 “is unsupported by any factual content to plausibly suggest [Montana State University’s (“MSU”)] alleged policies or customs—all of which are gender neutral on their face— ' Doe. 3. * Doc.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API