Legal Opinion

United States v. Trotter

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 21, 1980No. ACM S24839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

A special court-martial convicted the accused of making a false official statement and filing a fraudulent claim in violation of Articles 107 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 932.

Appellate defense counsel assert that the accused’s confession which resulted from questioning the accused without advisement of his rights under Article 31, Code, 10 U.S.C. § 831, supra, was improperly admitted into evidence. However, Government counsel contend that advice under Article 31, Code, supra, was not required because the accused was not a suspect at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. AnglinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. SchaferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. HenryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. GrahamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. HardyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. GoldsmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. LavineU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API