Legal Opinion

Rocchigiani v. World Boxing Council, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 7, 2001No. 98 CIV. 6781(RO)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Defendant World Boxing Council moves for “Reconsideration/Reargument” pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3 on the ground that this Court’s Opinion and Order of February 14, 2001 granting plaintiff Graci-ano Rocchigiani partial summary judgment with respect to WBC’s liability on his contract claim “[o]verlooked dispositive factual matters and controlling decisions.”

Reconsideration is discretionary, the relevant factor for today’s purposes being the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. See Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. v. National Mediation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Ellen Howley v. Town of Stratford and William HoldsworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Lee N. Koehler v. The Bank of Bermuda LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API