Legal Opinion

Mord v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

On February 28, 1924, defendant issued a policy of insurance by which, in consideration of a stipulated premium of $112.50 agreed to be paid, it insured plaintiff’s assignor, Philip Nathan & Co., Inc., in the sum of $10,000 against loss by burglary. The term was for one year from February 11, 1924, and the policy included a provision that it could be canceled by defendant at any time by written notice served upon the assured by the representative of the company and that the assured would, in such an event, be entitled to receive a return of the unearned paid premium computed pro rata. No part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Stone v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co. of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Kramnicz v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Beidler & Bockmyer Co. v. Universal Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  5. Transamerica Interway, Inc. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. of South Africa, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API