Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment and a cross motion by defendant to amend the answer by adding three additional defenses. Considering the latter motion first, we have the following situation: The proposed affirmative defense “Third” alleges: “That during

the period of plaintiff’s suspension, the period herein sued for, the Personnel Director, has never certified any estimate; payroll or account containing the name of the plaintiff credited with pay for said period.” The proposed affirmative defense “ Fourth ” alleges: “ That the plaintiff has never obtained a writ of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brenner v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Rochester City Court · 1985
  2. O'Neill v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API