Legal Opinion

Lark v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2001No. 48A02-0011-CR-723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

In a published opinion, a divided panel of this court affirmed the appellant's multiple convictions, all of which stemmed from a traffic stop. See Lark v. State, 755 N.E.2d 1153 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (Riley, J., dissenting). The pertinent facts are set out in that opinion and need not be repeated in detail here. The State petitions for rehearing, urging us to correct a mis-impression that it fears our opinion may have created regarding the requirements for a valid search and seizure under the Indiana Constitution. We grant the petition solely for that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kenner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Lark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API