In Re Byrd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Chief Justice.
The question presented for review in this case is whether the consent of a putative father must be obtained before an adoption may proceed when the putative father has conditioned his acknowledgment of fatherhood and support of mother and child upon proof of biological paternity. The Court of Appeals held that the putative father’s consent was not required under the circumstances of the case. In re Adoption of Byrd, 137 N.C. App. 623, 632, 529 S.E.2d 465, 471 (2000). For the reasons set forth below, we uphold this result.
The circumstances of this case as they developed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carpenter v. HawleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Alamance County Hospital, Inc. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Adoption of AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re Adoption of C.H.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Miller v. LillichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re the Adoption of S.K.N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.