Legal Opinion
Helge v. Druke
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 11, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4794PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Petitioner challenges the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for change of judge and to grant his motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. A special action is the proper vehicle for review. Equitable General Insurance Company v. Helm, 128 Ariz. 6, 623 P.2d 365 (1981); Dean v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa, 84 Ariz. 104, 324 P.2d 764 (1958); Kirkpatrick v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App. 564, 460 P.2d 670 (1969).
The petitioner is an attorney and a resident of California. He was in Tucson attending court proceedings in the dissolution…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harry I. Schwimmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Consolidated Rendering Co. v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LambertonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Dunn v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Carpenter v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State, Department of Family Services, Division of Public Assistance & Social Services Ex Rel. BJC v. DDMWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Nineteen Thousand Two Hundred & Thirty-Eight Dollars ($19,238.00) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.