James David Autry v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent

Autry seeks in his third federal habeas application a certificate of probable cause and stay of execution. Persuaded that there is neither a “question of substance” nor a “substantial showing of the denial of [a] federal right” the application is denied. Barefoot v. Estelle, -- U.S. --, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 3394, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983).

I

We affirmed denial of Petitioner’s First Application for Habeas Relief in June 1983. Autry v. Estelle, 706 F.2d 1394 (5th Cir.1983). The Supreme Court denied Autry’s request for stay on October 3, 1983, Autry v. Estelle, -- U.S. --, 104 S.Ct. 20, 78 L.Ed.2d 1…