State ex rel. Ruesswig v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by relator from an order of the district court for Itasca county, McClenahan, J., denying an application to file an information in the nature of quo warranto, without the consent of the attorney general, and discharging an order requiring respondents to show cause why leave should not be granted to file an information to test the right of respondents to hold office as members of the board of county commissioners of Koochiching county.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The facts in this case, briefly stated, are as follows: On January 25, 1906, a petition in due form of law for the creation of a new county out of territory within the boundaries of Itasca county, to be known as Koochiching county, was presented to and filed with the secretary' of state. It contained the requisite number of signers and was in all respects in compliance with the statute under which it was presented. Chapter 143, p. 262, Laws 1893. On February 15 of the same year a petition for another new county out of territory embraced within the same county was properly filed with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Barnum v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- United Hebrew Benevolent Ass'n v. BenshimolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Cole v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Julien v. Model Building, Loan & Investment Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nelson v. Consol. Independent Sch. Dist. of Troy MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Evens v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State ex rel. Wah-We-Yea-Cumin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Montecito County Water District v. DoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.