Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 14, 1996No. 94-0374PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSundby, J.

The Labor and Industry Review Commission's interpretation in this case of the permanent partial disability schedule, § 102.52(1), STATS., "rupturfes] . .. the conceptual tidiness which is . . . the very essence of the scheduled-injury approach," Lauhoff Grain Co. v. McIntosh, 395 N.W.2d 834, 840 (Iowa 1986). We conclude that "[t]he loss of an arm at the shoulder," a "scheduled" injury, clearly and unambiguously does not include appellant's shoulder injury. However, we do agree with LIRC that "[t]he loss of an arm" includes impairment of the use of appellant's arm. We therefore reverse that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of LeedsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Girouard v. Circuit Court for Jackson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hagen v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API