Legal Opinion

Mainwaring v. Bark Carrie Delap

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 6, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtChoate, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for injury done to bales of empty grain bags, shipped by the libellant at Liverpool for New York, under a bill of lading which stipulated in the usual form for their delivery in good order, “the perils of the sea” excepted. The bark was put up as a general ship. Her cargo consisted of 323 tierces and 40 casks of soda ash, 300 drums of caustic soda, 265 tierces of bleaching powder, 1,850 sacks of salt, 10,000 fire-brick, 1,703 empty petroleum barrels, 840 boxes of cutch, and 110 bales of bags, of which 67 were shipped by the libellant. There was some other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Lamb v. ParkmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1857
  4. Pierce v. WinsorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. The VerdiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Lazarus v. BarberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  4. Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Grace Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API