Legal Opinion

Pierce v. City of Lansing

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2005No. 250124PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

694 N.W.2d 65 (2005)

264 Mich.App. 174

Sheryl L. PIERCE and Herman M. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF LANSING, Defendant-Appellant, and

Otis Elevator Company, Defendant.

Docket No. 250124.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted February 2, 2005, at Lansing.

Decided February 10, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication March 29, 2005.

Sinas, Dramis, Brake, Boughton & McIntyre, P.C. (by Michael E. Larkin), Lansing, for Sheryl L. and Herman M. Pierce.

Plunkett & Cooney, P.C. (by Mary Massaron Ross, Camille T. Horne, and David K. Otis), Detroit, for the city of Lansing.

Before: MARKEY, P.J., and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willett v. Waterford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. McManamon v. Redford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Kendricks v. RehfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Radu v. Herndon & Herndon Investigations, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Jackson County Drain Commissioner v. Village of StockbridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API