Legal Opinion
Pullman Arms Inc. v. Healey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-40136-TSHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Pullman Arms, Inc., Guns and Gear, LLC, Paper City Firearms, LLC, and National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") brought this action to challenge the Enforcement Notice issued by Attorney General Healey. Attorney General Healey now moves to stay this litigation pursuant to *120Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States , 424 U.S. 800, 813, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). For the reasons stated below, Defendant's motion (Docket No. 67) is denied.
Background
In July 2016, Attorney General Healey informed the public of her plan to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Azurin v. Bio-Medical Applications of California, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Pierce Aluminum Company, Inc v. Masteel America Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Sequin, LLC v. Kimberly RenkDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020