Legal Opinion
In Re Starkey
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 13, 1990No. 19-10900PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EXEMPTIONS
CHARLES E. MATHESON, Chief Judge.
These matters came before the Court in the above three cases, John Edwin Starkey (“Starkey”), Delbert L. and Carole Ann Richardson (“Richardson”) and Patrick V. Daily (“Daily”), (collectively referred to as “Debtors”), on objections filed by the respective trustees to each Debtor’s claim of exemptions. In each case the Debtors have scheduled, as a part of their assets, an interest in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) qualified pension plan. In each case the Debtors have claimed part or all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re KometUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
- Schechter v. Balay (In Re Balay)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Matter of Marshall James Dyke, Debtor. William E. Heitkamp, Trustee v. Marshall James Dyke, in the Matter of Amos Daniel Felts, A/K/A Dan Felts, and Laura Otila Felts, Debtors. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for United Bank of Texas v. Amos Daniel Felts, A/K/A Dan Felts, and Laura Otila FeltsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re DamastUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- In Re IdalskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- In Re MajulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1990
- Heitkamp v. DykeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.