Legal Opinion
LIMBRIGHT v. Hofmeister
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided February 1, 2010No. 6:09-cv-00107PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendants to dismiss or, alternatively, to require Plaintiffs to restate their claims under Kentucky law and with particularity. The parties having fully briefed the motion, it is ripe for consideration.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2000, Innovative Coating Technologies, Inc. (“ICT”) purchased from James and Henry Limbright 100 percent of the stock in Performance Plastics, Inc., a Michigan corporation. ICT’s obligation to pay for the stock was evidenced by two promissory notes, which were personally…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Marc D. Mezibov v. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010