Legal Opinion

Acquackanonk Water Co. v. Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 19, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was prepared bjr the late Mr. Justice Bergen, in compliance with the assignment to him. It clearly expresses the view of the court upon the matters involved in the litigation, and is adopted by the court as its own opinion in the cause.

Bergen, J.

The four cases above designated, with two others not now argued, were tried together. In the cases now under consideration each plaintiff had a verdict, and each defendant was allowed a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, reserving certain exceptions taken at the trial. The trial court discharged the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Jersey Highway Authority v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. State, by State Highway Commissioner v. HankinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. State v. AngletonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. STATE BY STATE HIGHWAY COMM'R v. HankinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API