Legal Opinion
STATE BY STATE HIGHWAY COMM'R v. Hankins
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 4, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
59 N.J. Super. 27 (1960)
157 A.2d 41
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BY THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, APPLICANT,
v.
WILBUR F. HANKINS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 4, 1960.
Mr. Thomas C. Mitchell, Deputy Attorney General, attorney for State Highway Commissioner.
Mr. Robert A. Lederer, attorney for respondent Hankins.
Messrs. Hiering & Grasso, attorneys for respondent Ferguson.
LARRABEE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Hankins and Ferguson owned a tract on the north side of State Highway Route No. 37 and proposed to erect a gasoline service station thereon. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Morse v. Union Stock Yard Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Hart v. LeonardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
- New Jersey Highway Authority v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Bank of Amador CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charlestown Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In re Competrol Acquisition Partnership, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994