Legal Opinion

People v. Tidwell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from convictions, one defendant for murder in tlie second degree, tbe other defendant for voluntary manslaughter in the district court of the first district.

Read the full summary

Appeal from convictions, one defendant for murder in tlie second degree, tbe other defendant for voluntary manslaughter in the district court of the first district. The opinion states the facts, except the following: The instructions given by the court upon the subject of the burden of proof, are as follows: The statute of this territory provides that “Upon a trial for murder, the commission of the homicide by the defendant being proved, the burden of proving circumstances of mitigation, or that justify or excuse it devolves upon him, unless the proof on the part of the prosecution tends to…

1Opinion of the Court

ZANE, C. J.:

The defendants were tried in the first district court on an indictment charging them with the murder of one Augustus Sorenson, and the defendants Frank and Thomas Tidwell were found guilty of murder in the second degree, and. the defendant Anderson guilty of voluntary manslaughter. They were all sentenced to terms of imprisonment in the penitentiary — Frank for six years and six months, Thomas for five years and six months, and Anderson for one year and six months. From this judgment the defendants Thomas Tidwell and Joseph Anderson appealed to this court.

*509It appears from the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. State v. VacosUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. DeweyUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. DillonUtah Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. KesslerUtah Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API