Palyok v. Borough of West Mifflin
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge McGinley,
This is an appeal by Michael Palyok (Palyok) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) which denied a Motion For Summary Judgment on Palyoks Complaint in Mandamus and granted the Motion for Summary Judgment of the Borough of Wést Mifflin et al., (Borough).
The stipulated statement of facts, as adopted by the trial court, establishes that Palyok was employed as a full time police officer by the Borough from November *271, 1958, until his retirement on May 1, 1985. During his employment, Palyok contributed a percentage of his salary and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gardner v. JenkinsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Borough of Beaver v. ListonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cottone v. KulisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palyok v. Borough of West MifflinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- City of Arnold, PA v. Wage Policy Committee of the City of Arnold PD, o/b/o P. CiminoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Arcurio v. Greater Johnstown School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- S. Sheppleman v. City of Chester Aggregated Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- S. Sheppleman v. City of Chester Aggregated Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021