Legal Opinion

Haley v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1918No. 448PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of error; from Bibb superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

When the object of a receivership in an equitable action had been accomplished, an issue was raised as to the arnount of fees to be paid to the receiver and to the attorneys. The issue was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and upon the conclusion of the evidence specified sums were separately awarded to the receiver and to the attorneys. The bill of exceptions, after reciting the facts as indicated, assigned'error as follows: “to which ruling and order of the court the plaintiff in error then and there excepted, and now excepts and assigns the same as error.” H'eld, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Hall v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Adams v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pace v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Edwards v. FinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API