Legal Opinion

Spearman v. United Mutual Burial Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The case was beard below upon an agreed statement- of facts. From this it appears that plaintiff’s intestate, Maxie Spearman, became a member of defendant Burial Association 5 March, 1943, and so remained until his death 11 March, 1944. The purpose and plan of the Association was to provide funeral and burial service for deceased members in the amount, of $100.

Plaintiff’s intestate while a member of the armed forces of the United States and in the line of duty died on Guadalcanal in the Pacific and was buried there. At that time Guadalcanal was in the theater of war and it was impossible for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helmholz v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  2. Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Wilson v. . Order of HeptasophsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Faulk v. Fraternal Mystic CircleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Boyce v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Adair v. ORRELL'S MUTUAL BURIAL ASSOCIATION, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Poole & Kent Corp. v. C. E. Thurston & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Webb v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API