Legal Opinion

Poole & Kent Corp. v. C. E. Thurston & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1974No. 5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The record before us discloses that the procedures in the trial court were regular, the evidence was sufficient to support the findings of fact, and the findings were sufficient- to support-the conclusions of law and the judgment.,

The Court of Appeals, after its careful review, correctly concluded the judgment of the superior court should be affirmed. Judge Parker’s opinion is so complete and well documented that little need be said here except that we approve.

Although the material facts in the case are not in dispute, nevertheless in view of the important questions of law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Adair v. ORRELL'S MUTUAL BURIAL ASSOCIATION, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Angel v. TruittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Fagen's of North Carolina, Inc. v. Rocky River Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Wise v. Harrington Grove Community Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Smith v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API