Heath v. Solles
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Juneau County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. They cited Lcmer v. Bandow, 43 Wis. 556, 561; Engfer v. Boemer, II id. 11; Smith v. Gill, 31 Minn. 455; Jones v. Walker, 63 N. T. 612; Fullerton lumber Go. v. Osborn, 72 Iowa, 472; Flannery v. Bohrrnayer, 46 Oonn. 558; Gilman v. Disbrow, 45 id. 563.
1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.
This action was brought against Edgar Bolles and Susan Solles, by the respondents, to obtain judgment against the appellant Edgar Solles for the value of a bill of lumber claimed to have been sold to him by the respondents, to be used, and which was in fact used, by him in constructing a dwelling-house upon the lands of the appellant Susan Solles, and' to have the amount found due the respondents declared a lien upon the building and lands of said Susan Solles. Susan Solles wras the wife of Edgar Solles. On the trial in the circuit court the respondents obtained a personal judgment against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCoy v. QuickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Wilkinson v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Lauer v. BandowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Edleman v. KiddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Rees v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1892
- Coorsen v. ZiehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Edwards & McCulloch Lumber Co. v. MosherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Cook v. GoodyearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Congdon v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.