Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Workers' Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1986No. A8312-07460; CA A34212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiffs are injured workers who receive permanent total disability (PTD) workers’ compensation benefits and Social Security disability benefits. Defendants are the Workers’ Compensation Department and the director of its Compliance Division. In August, 1983, pursuant to ORS 656.209, 1 defendants authorized employers and insurers responsible for plaintiffs’ PTD benefits to offset their federal disability payments from their workers’ compensation benefits to a greater extent than had previously been authorized. 2 The department also promulgated temporary rules, OAR 436-57-001 to 436-57-998,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schlecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Speciality Risk Services v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Gordineer v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Nicholson v. BlachlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. SAIF Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Rivera v. Perlo Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API