Simmons v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered by the wife in a collision between an electric interurban car operated by the defendant Railway Company and an autobus or jitney operated by a servant of the defendant Walker—a carrier of passengers for hire. Mrs. Simmons was a passenger on the autobus. Walker and the Railway Company were made defendants on the theory that the negligence of each concurred in causing the injury. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants, who, upon different records, present separate appeals from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Theobald v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Adolph v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Aungst v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
- Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939