Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1922No. Civ. No. 3872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered by the wife in a collision between an electric interurban car operated by the defendant Railway Company and an autobus or jitney operated by a servant of the defendant Walker—a carrier of passengers for hire. Mrs. Simmons was a passenger on the autobus. Walker and the Railway Company were made defendants on the theory that the negligence of each concurred in causing the injury. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants, who, upon different records, present separate appeals from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Theobald v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Adolph v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Aungst v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  4. Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API