Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. City of Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1916No. 7132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Butts superior court — Judge Searcy. September 30, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRtjssell, C. J.

1. The jurisdiction of the State courts to try persons charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors is exclusive, and a municipal court can not punish for a violation of the State law'. There may be cases in which proof of a single sale, without more, may not necessarily imply that the seller kept liquors for sale. Everett v. Vidalia, 14 Ga. App. 664 (82 S. E. 50). However, proof of a single sale, if made under such circumstances as to show either a continuing purpose on the part of the vendor to sell a stock of liquor, or to indicate that the particular liquor sold was kept for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reese v. City of NewnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Rooney v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Everett v. City of VidaliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API