Legal Opinion
Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 70 and 71PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
On December 13, 1956 Philadelphia Transportation Company (which we will refer to as the Company) filed an application with the Public Utility Commission at A83937, for leave to abandon service and facilities on the portion of Rail Route 6 between Cheltenham Avenue (Philadelphia City Line) and the village of Willow Grove to the north, in Montgomery County. In a second concurrent application at A59145, the Company sought the right to substitute bus service for *601that of the abandoned street railway between Willow Grove and the City Line, and to continue the bus service from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Byers v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lyons Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fritz v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hess v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Department of Transportation v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Souderton BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.