Legal Opinion

Hess v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Marvin Roger Hess and Leona Hess, Ronald and Dianne Mace, Roy and Cindy Maurer, The Shoop Family Trust c/o Edwin and Denny Shoop, and Gary and Dor-ene Lahr (Protestants) Petition for Review of the Order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) which approved the Applications of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (PPL)1, to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire rights-of-way and easements over certain lands of Protestants for construction of a new eleven-mile transmission line and substation.

PPL is a public utility and an electric…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. E. Walden v. PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. J. Kline v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. New Garden Twp. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. P. & C. Hughes v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. P.M. Cicero v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API