Legal Opinion

Starret v. Burkhalter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— The complaint in this case was by Charles Starret, against Moses A. Lentz and Edward Burk-halter, on a promissory note for five hundred dollars, dated September 25th, 1869, and payable one day after date, with ten per cent, interest.

The only defence set up by Lentz was that of payment. Burkhalter answered separately, in two paragraphs :

1. . Admitting the execution of the note, and averring that he sigued the same only as surety for his codefendant, Lentz,, which fact was well known to the plaintiff; that, although the note was payable one day after date, it was agreed and understood between…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Menifee v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. McCloskey v. Indianapolis Manufacturers & Carpenters' UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. White v. WhitneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henry v. GillilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Starret v. BurkhalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Voris v. ShottsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Holmes v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API