Legal Opinion

Schramme v. Cowin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The court at Special Term has granted an injunction pendente lite in the following terms:

“ * * * during the pendency of this action the defendants, Albert A. Cowin, Charles M. Cohen and Isaac V. Schavrien, individually and as officers and directors of the Inwood Land & Improvement Co., Inc., and the Inwood Land & Improvement Co., Inc., and each of them, and their and each of their agents, attorneys and servants and officers, be, and they hereby are, and each of them is enjoined and prohibited from making, selling or putting up for sale any increase of capital stock of the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Conklin v. United Construction & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fehr Bros. v. ScheinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Katzowitz v. SidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Bellows v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API